Claudine gay husband

Claudine Gay (born August 4, ) [2] is an American political scientist who is the Wilbur A. Cowett Professor of Government and of African and African-American Studies at Harvard University. Her research focuses on American political behavior, including voter turnout and politics of race and identity. [3]. CLAUDINE Gay is widely known as the 30th of Harvard University and the first Black woman to assume this role.

Supporting the Ivy League's is her husband, Christopher Afendulis — here's everything to know about him. Claudine Gay's husband, Christopher Afendulis, is a senior research analyst and lecturer at Stanford University. The couple share one child, a son. Claudine Gay is married to Christopher C. Afendulis, who is working as an information systems analyst at Stanford University's Department of Health Research and Policy.

He received his undergraduate degree from the University of Michigan and his PhD in political science from Harvard University. Claudine Gay and her husband, Christopher Afendulis, outside Houghton Library, June 13, Photograph by Stephanie Mitchell/Harvard Public Affairs and Communications. It's not just Claudine Gay. Harvard University's chief diversity and inclusion officer, Sherri Ann Charleston, appears to have plagiarized extensively in her academic work, lifting large portions of text without quotation marks and even taking credit for a study done by another scholar—her own husband—according to a complaint filed with the university on Monday and a Washington Free Beacon analysis.

The complaint makes 40 allegations of plagiarism that span the entirety of Charleston's thin publication record. In her dissertation, submitted to the University of Michigan, Charleston quotes or paraphrases nearly a dozen scholars without proper attribution, the complaint alleges. And in her sole peer-reviewed journal article—coauthored with her husband, LaVar Charleston, in —the couple recycle much of a study published by LaVar Charleston, the deputy vice chancellor for diversity and inclusion at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, framing the old material as new research.

Through that sleight of hand, Sherri Ann Charleston effectively took credit for her husband's work. The paper, which was also coauthored with Jerlando Jackson, now the dean of Michigan State University's College of Education, and appeared in the Journal of Negro Education , has the same methods, findings, and description of survey subjects as the study, which involved interviews with black computer science students and was first published by the Journal of Diversity in Higher Education.

The two papers even report identical interview responses from those students. The overlap suggests that the authors did not conduct new interviews for the study but instead relied on LaVar Charleston's interviews from —a severe breach of research ethics, according to experts who reviewed the allegations.

Sherri Ann Charleston was the chief affirmative action officer at the University of Wisconsin-Madison before she joined Harvard in August as its first-ever chief diversity officer. In that capacity, Charleston served on the staff advisory committee that helped guide the university's ial search process that resulted in the selection of former Harvard Claudine Gay in December , according to the Harvard Crimson.

A historian and attorney by training, Charleston has taught courses on gender studies at the University of Wisconsin, according to her Harvard bio , which describes her as "one of the nation's leading experts in diversity. Experts who reviewed the allegations against Charleston said that they ranged from minor plagiarism to possible data fraud and warrant an investigation.

Some also argued that Charleston had committed a more serious scholarly sin than Gay, Harvard's former , who resigned in January after she was accused of lifting long passages from other authors without proper attribution. Papers that omit a few citations or quotation marks rarely receive more than a correction, experts said. But when scholars recycle large chunks of a previous study—especially its data or conclusions—without attribution, the duplicate paper is often retracted and can even violate copyright law.

Here, though, the duplicate paper added two new authors, Sherri Ann Charleston and Jerlando Jackson, who had no involvement in the original, letting them claim credit for the research and making them party to the con.

why did claudine gay resign

One-fifth of the paper, including two-thirds of its "findings" section, was published in the study, according to the complaint, and three interview responses are identical in both articles, suggesting they come from the same survey. According to Lee Jussim, a social psychologist at Rutgers University, "it is essentially impossible for two different people in two different studies to produce the same quote.

At worst, the authors committed data fraud by framing old survey responses as new ones—a separate and more serious offense. The Journal of Negro Education did not respond to a request for comment. Monday's complaint, which was filed anonymously, comes as Harvard is facing questions about the integrity of its research affiliates and the ideology of its diversity bureaucrats, most of whom report to the sprawling office that Sherri Ann Charleston oversees.

The Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, one of Harvard Medical School's three teaching hospitals, announced in January that it would retract six papers and correct dozens more after some of its top executives were accused of data manipulation. That news came on the heels of a viral essay in which Carole Hooven, a Harvard biologist, described how she had been hounded out of a teaching role by her department's diversity committee after she said in an interview that there are only two sexes.

The school is also facing an ongoing congressional probe over its handling of anti-Semitism and its response to the plagiarism allegations against Gay, which Harvard initially sought to suppress with legal saber-rattling. Half of Gay's published work contained plagiarized material, ranging from single sentences to entire paragraphs, with some of the most severe lifts coming in her dissertation.

Some of Charleston's offenses are similar to Gay's. In her dissertation, for example, Charleston borrows a sentence from Eric Arnesen's book Waterfront Workers of New Orleans: Race, Class, and Politics, , without quotation marks and without citing Arnesen's work in a footnote. She also lifts full paragraphs from her thesis adviser, Rebecca Scott, while making minimal semantic tweaks. Bailey added that the plagiarism of Scott alone merited an investigation—ideally, he said, "by a neutral party with no ties to either the school or the school's critics.

Harvard did not respond to a request for comment. Scott and Arnesen did not respond to requests for comment. Charleston cites each source in a footnote but omits quotation marks around language copied verbatim.